
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
UMUC European Division-Term IV-00-01 |
|||||||
|
INSS 540 INFORMATION SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Class Times: 9:00 - 16:00, weekend B Class Location: Rhein-Main, room TBA Lecturer: Valerie E. Mock, Ph.D. Phone: 370-6762 or 49-(0)6221-378219 Office Hours: 1/2 hr. before/after class; during lunch; or by appointment Webpage: www.docmock.com Course Credit: 3 semester hours Pre-requisite:For INSS 540: Either INSS 510, INSS 520, INSS 530 or permission of the lecturer: For IFSM 436 - IFSM 202 and CMIS 140 or 150 or equivalent. |
|||||||
|
Textbook: Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World by Satzinger, Jackson, and Burd, 1st Edition. Cambridge, MA: Course Technology, 2000. ISBN 0-7600-5879-2 |
|||||||
|
Handouts: Will be distributed from time-to-time. You will be responsible for this material also. |
|||||||
|
INSS 540 COURSE DESCRIPTION |
|||||||
|
This course provides an in-depth look at all phases of information systems development. Requirements acquisition methodologies are reviewed and evaluated with respect to different application areas. Logical design is reviewed and implementation issues are addressed. Data centered as well as process-centered approaches to system design are reviewed. Particular design methodologies, including structured design, are discussed. Life cycle as well as heuristic approaches to system development are examined and discussed. Organizational and behavioral issues with respect to information system development are examined. An analysis and design project will be required. |
|||||||
|
IFSM 436 COURSE DESCRIPTION |
|||||||
|
Advanced study of structured systems development. Topics include strategies and techniques of structured analysis and structured design for producing logical methodologies for dealing with complexity in the development of information systems. |
|||||||
|
GRADING CRITERIA/SCALE |
|||||||
|
GRADING CRITERIA: |
|
|
GRADING SCALE |
||||
|
Analysis/Design Team Project |
600 points |
|
|
|
|||
|
(50 points) |
|
90-100 points = |
A |
|||
|
(50 points) |
|
80- 89 points = |
B |
|||
|
(150 points) |
|
70 -79 points = |
C |
|||
|
(150 points) |
|
Below 70 points = |
FA |
|||
|
(50 points) |
|
|
|
|||
|
(50 points) |
|
|
|
|||
|
(50 points) |
|
|
|
|||
|
(50 points) |
|
|
|
|||
|
Midterm/Final Tests |
300 points |
|
|
|
|||
|
Research Paper(Grad only) |
100 points |
|
|
|
|||
|
TOTAL 900 Undergrad |
1000 points Grad |
|
|
|
|||
|
. ASSIGNMENTS |
|
This class is typically run with the class members forming actual systems analysis/design teams. Therefore, the ability to perform in an effective and efficient team will be of paramount importance to the student's successful completion of this course. This approach is designed to imitate the "real-world" as much as possible given the limited resources and time constraints for this class. In order to give students the needed class time to experience working as teams, the concepts portions of this class are concentrated in the front portion of the term |
|
Analysis/Design Team Project-Each team will be expected to prepare a complete systems analysis/design package that includes an RFP (request for proposal) that outlines the systems requirements, project management data (including a budget and a schedule), a response to the RFP, design specifications, prototypes, walkthrough reports and action lists, and other items the team deems pertinent (such as a data dictionary) as though this document was to be passed on to an entire development team for implementation. Every graded step of this project should be performed in a manner as close to a professional environment as possible, for example, the RFP should resemble an RFP produced by real organization/company and the project output should resemble design specifications rather than the typical academic report. During this project, each student will be expected to try to "put on a different analysis/design hat" for at least two roles, so they will get the most from the experience. The analysis/design should be in enough detail to convey the needs of the total system; however, it is expected that the team will focus their efforts in one or two specific areas. The portion of the total system chosen should be enough to demonstrate the team's ability to analyze/design a database, input/output, the user interface, and network considerations. Each project should also accommodate considerations for international expansion or presence (such as, currency or address considerations). The undergraduate student's participation in the design teams will be graded on the expectation that their contribution will not be as in-depth of that of a graduate student. The total project grade will be adjusted to account for undergraduate participation. |
|
Midterm/Final--The midterm and final will consist of short answer essay questions related to the goals listed at the beginning of each chapter and the outside readings and for grad students only a comprehensive exam question. This portion of the tests (worth 100 points) will be graded exactly like the comprehensives; that is: 75% for content, 15% for English and organization, and 10% for references. |
|
Subject Research---Each student will make a 10- to 15-minute class presentation on research pertaining to one of the objectives listed below. In addition, students shall turn in a 2- to 3-page summary along with a page of resources used (use the APA format for this bibliography as provided on the U of M Library website) and provide each class member a 1-page handout. Students will be graded on the quality of their presentations and summations along with their classroom discussion. By the end of the class every student should have an elementary understanding of these topics; this material will be eligible for testing on exams. These presentations are typically due around the date that the applicable topic is being studied. |
|
COURSE POLICIES/EXPECTATIONS |
|
The following policies apply to this class. These policies are generally reflected in the graduate catalog. |
|
ATTENDANCE POLICY: Regular class attendance is expected. If you should miss a meeting, it is your responsibility to obtain information concerning the material covered and upcoming assignments. If there is a quiz or other assignment due on that class period, previous arrangements should be made with the instructor whenever possible. Please note that those students receiving tuition assistance from the Federal Government must not miss three consecutive class meetings without prior approval, or the education Services Officer (ESO) must be notified by the instructor. |
|
ACADEMIC HONESTY: Students are expected to do their own work. Cheating on tests, plagiarism on written assignments, or any other form of academic dishonesty will result in a "0" for the assignment. Note that a D or an F usually results in at least 60 or 50 points, where violation of academic honesty results in none. See the European Division Catalog for the UMUC policy on academic dishonesty and plagiarism. |
|
ASSIGNMENT/TEST SCHEDULES: Students are expected to hand in all assignments and complete all tests on the days they are due. If a student fails to complete any assignment or test, the resulting grade will be a "0," rather than an "F." Any other assignments will be marked down half a letter grade for each half week the assignment is late, unless prior arrangements are made. Quizzes cannot be made-up unless the student had an excused absence. Major tests can be made up only if prior arrangements are made with the instructor. |
|
CLASS PREPARATION: Students are expected to come to class prepared. This means they should have read the materials assigned for class for that session and have prepared any pertinent assignments. Quizzes may be given on the reading assignments before they are discussed in class. |
|
COURSE OBJECTIVES |
|
The objectives for this course are listed as "Learning Objectives" at the beginning of every chapter and below. The questions on the midterm/final will be directly related to these objectives, even though the specific topic may not be covered in class. At the end of the class the students should be able to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to the academic objectives, students are expected to improve their skills in the following areas: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LECTURER INFORMATION |
|
Teaching Philosophy-I believe students learn best when learning is fun and applied to real-world situations and when students are involved in the process. Therefore, students are expected to participate in discussions, work in groups to resolve in-class exercises, assist their fellow students when possible (without doing their work for them), and to ask questions when there is confusion. I believe that every student starts out with an A in the class and through his/her behavior illustrates to me that they are unworthy of an A. As an instructor, it is my job to facilitate the learning process, but I can't do so unless I have feedback as to what may be impeding that process. |
|
Biography-After obtaining a BA from the University of Chicago in Anthropology, Dr. Mock worked for IBM for 15 years, primarily in the technical writing field as writer, editor, manager, and second-line manager. Her highest position was as the division's publications coordinator in the Systems Architecture Department reporting to the General Systems Division Vice President of Manufacturing. She has worked with the IBM 1800MPX System, the 360 and 370 Systems, the System/34, /36, and /38, among others. For several years she was a member of an application development team working in the manufacturing, health, education, and banking industries. After leaving IBM, she worked as an consultant to the IBM Corporation, the American Red Cross, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Time Systems International, and Zygonic Technologies. |
|
In 1981 she received her MBA from Emory University and completed her Ph.D. at Georgia State University in Management in 1992. Since that time she has been teaching business courses at Piedmont College in northeast Georgia and at Fort Valley State University in central Georgia. She has worked for UMUC, European Division for 3 years and was recently appointed Academic Director, Graduate Programs. |
TENTATIVE SCHEDULE
|
Class |
Concepts |
Activities |
|
Class 1a: 31 March |
Introduction to Course, Instructor, fellow students; The Modern Systems Analyst; The Analyst as Project; International Implications of Systems Analysis and Design; Ethical Implications of Systems Analysis and Design |
General discussion of syllabi and introduction to class; exercise on analysis and design; Lecture(s)/Discussions; Discussion of international consequences; Discussion of ethical issues; Assignment: Read Chapters 1 and 2 |
|
Class 1b: 31 March |
Approaches to System Development; Working in Teams/Groups; Budgeting, Scheduling, and Business Cases; Interpersonal Skills and Communications; An Introduction to RFPs |
Lecture(s)/Discussions; Formation of Teams and Group exercise; Assignment: Read Chapter 3 and Appendices 1-3. |
|
Class 2a: 1 April |
Investigating and Modeling System Requirements; Entity Relationship Diagrams; A Word on Market Research; Analysis, Design and Implementation Roles; Prototypes; Walkthroughs and Quality Assurance Processes/Role |
Lecture(s)/Discussions; Role-playing exercise; Group exercises on data and process modeling; Assignment: Read Chapters 4 and 5 |
|
Class 2b: 1 April |
Traditional and Object-oriented Approaches to Requirements; Data Flow Diagrams |
Lecture(s)/Discussions; Assignment: Read Chapters 6 and 7 |
|
Class 3a: 21 April |
Environments, Alternatives, and Decisions; Rapid Application Development and Component-Based Development |
Lecture(s)/Discussions; Group Work as needed; Assignment: Statements of team projects, schedules, and roles due; Read Chapters 8 and 13 |
|
Class 3b: 21 April |
Moving to Design (through The Structured Approach); Presenting the Results |
Lecture(s)/Discussions; Mini-JAD session based on proposed systems analysis. Assignment: Read Chapter 9 and Appendix D |
|
Class 4a: 22 April |
Moving to Design (The Object-Oriented Approach); Database Design |
Lecture(s)/Discussions; Group work as needed; Assignment: Read Chapter 10 |
|
Class 4b: 22 April |
Designing Inputs, Outputs, and Controls |
Lecture(s)/Discussions; Group work as needed; Assignment: Read Chapters 11 and 13 |
|
Class 5a: 5 May |
Human-Computer Interaction; Knowing your User; Review of International Considerations |
Lecture(s)/Discussions; Group work as needed; Assignment: Read Chapters 12 |
|
Class 5b: 5 May |
Summary of Analysis and Design Concepts |
Midterm/Final; Assignment: First draft of RFP due |
|
Class 6a: 6May |
Packaged Software and Enterprise Resource Planning |
Lecture(s)/Discussions; Group Work as needed; Assignment: Read Chapter 14 |
|
Class 6b: 6 May |
Applying Data Base Design Concepts |
Walkthroughs of Data Base or other application Designs; Assignment: Data Base or other application Designs Draft due |
|
Class 7a: 19 May |
Applying Input/Output/User Interface Design Concepts |
Walkthroughs of Input/Output/User Interface Designs; Assignment: Drafts of these designs due |
|
Class 7b: 19 May |
Systems Support; Planning for System Support; Usability testing |
Lecture(s)/Discussions; Walkthroughs of System Support Plan; Assignment: Read Chapter 15; System Support Plan due |
|
Class 8a: 20 May |
Transitioning from Design to Implementation; Systems Implementation |
Lecture(s)/Discussions; Group Work as needed |
|
Class 8b: 20 May |
Project Summary |
Assignment: Presentations of Systems Design by Design Teams (possibly video tape); Complete Project including RFP (Systems Analysis) and RFP Response (Systems Design) due |
Return to: Graduate Programs Syllabi